Branch: refs/heads/main
Home: https://github.com/OpenAMP/open-amp
Commit: 46d041808804f83a902a9f60fdfb6beffed22470
https://github.com/OpenAMP/open-amp/commit/46d041808804f83a902a9f60fdfb6bef…
Author: Ed Mooring <ed.mooring(a)gmail.com>
Date: 2022-11-04 (Fri, 04 Nov 2022)
Changed paths:
M apps/machine/zynqmp_r5/rsc_table.c
Log Message:
-----------
zynqmp_r5 resource table: Change notifyid for the virtio device.
1. At firmware build time, the resource table for the Xilinx zynqmp_r5
is set up with notifyid==0 for the rpmsg virtio device. The vrings are
set up with notifyid==1 for vring0 and notifyid==2 for vring1.
2. When the firmware is loaded onto the R5 via the Linux remoteproc sysfs
interface, the kernel remoteproc implementation ignores the notifyid
values for the vrings, and reallocates them, changing the resource
table. On the Xilinx configuration I tested on, this results in vring0
being allocated notifyid 0, and vring1 being allocated notifyid 1.
3. When the remote processor is started, it parses the resource table. When
it gets to the virtio device, it calls handle_vdev_rsc(), which
in turn calls remoteproc_allocate_id() with the vdev's notifyid of
0. This successfully returns 0. Then handle_vdev_rsc() goes through the
vrings. On vring0, it calls remoteproc_allocate_id(), with notifyid set to
0, because Linux changed vring0.notifyid from 1 to 0 in (2) above. This
results in remoteproc_allocate_id() returning RSC_NOTIFY_ID_ANY. This
causes handle_vdev_rsc() to return -RPROC_ERR_RSC_TAB_NP after commit
03c80a1, which causes the firmware startup to fail.
This appeared to work in previous versions, because
remoteproc_allocate_id() returning RSC_NOTIFY_ID_ANY was effectively
ignored, leaving the notifyid unchanged and allowing execution to
continue.
Set the value of notifyid for the virtio device (rvdev) to 31 to
avoid possible conflicts with the Linux imposed values.
Signed-off-by: Ed Mooring <ed.mooring(a)gmail.com>
Commit: 568d507be81a27230ba3f0260485f2ee699f5aa0
https://github.com/OpenAMP/open-amp/commit/568d507be81a27230ba3f0260485f2ee…
Author: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen(a)foss.st.com>
Date: 2022-11-04 (Fri, 04 Nov 2022)
Changed paths:
M VERSION
Log Message:
-----------
release: open-amp 2022.10.0
Set library version to 1.3.0
Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen(a)foss.st.com>
Signed-off-by: Ed Mooring <ed.mooring(a)gmail.com>
Compare: https://github.com/OpenAMP/open-amp/compare/88d2e4ce38b8...568d507be81a
Branch: refs/heads/main
Home: https://github.com/OpenAMP/open-amp
Commit: 88d2e4ce38b8fe4af4ce84b2ec68a6b10a328169
https://github.com/OpenAMP/open-amp/commit/88d2e4ce38b8fe4af4ce84b2ec68a6b1…
Author: Ed Mooring <ed.mooring(a)gmail.com>
Date: 2022-11-04 (Fri, 04 Nov 2022)
Changed paths:
M apps/machine/zynqmp_r5/rsc_table.c
Log Message:
-----------
zynqmp_r5 resource table: Change notifyid for the virtio device.
1. At firmware build time, the resource table for the Xilinx zynqmp_r5
is set up with notifyid==0 for the rpmsg virtio device. The vrings are
set up with notifyid==1 for vring0 and notifyid==2 for vring1.
2. When the firmware is loaded onto the R5 via the Linux remoteproc sysfs
interface, the kernel remoteproc implementation ignores the notifyid
values for the vrings, and reallocates them, changing the resource
table. On the Xilinx configuration I tested on, this results in vring0
being allocated notifyid 0, and vring1 being allocated notifyid 1.
3. When the remote processor is started, it parses the resource table. When
it gets to the virtio device, it calls handle_vdev_rsc(), which
in turn calls remoteproc_allocate_id() with the vdev's notifyid of
0. This successfully returns 0. Then handle_vdev_rsc() goes through the
vrings. On vring0, it calls remoteproc_allocate_id(), with notifyid set to
0, because Linux changed vring0.notifyid from 1 to 0 in (2) above. This
results in remoteproc_allocate_id() returning RSC_NOTIFY_ID_ANY. This
causes handle_vdev_rsc() to return -RPROC_ERR_RSC_TAB_NP after commit
03c80a1, which causes the firmware startup to fail.
This appeared to work in previous versions, because
remoteproc_allocate_id() returning RSC_NOTIFY_ID_ANY was effectively
ignored, leaving the notifyid unchanged and allowing execution to
continue.
Set the value of notifyid for the virtio device (rvdev) to 31 to
avoid possible conflicts with the Linux imposed values.
Signed-off-by: Ed Mooring <ed.mooring(a)gmail.com>
Hi All,
I have 2 items for discussion for the community call tomorrow:
For the Remoteproc-core API rproc_get_by_child
I have a use case where I would like to call this on the current
rproc->device.
2 things:
1. At
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc…
There may be a bug here in that if the device is copied, then
device->type comparison will fail.
Can we change this to “if (!strncmp(dev->type->name, (&rproc_type)->name,
strlen((&rproc_type)->name)) ? That way even if the device is copied the
check will work.
1. For the same API, is it Ok to extend the for loop so it supports
search on the ‘current’ device passed in?
That is change
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc…
“for (dev = dev->parent; dev; dev = dev->parent) {“
to
“for (; dev; dev = dev->parent) {“
This way we can account for the current device having the rproc dev.
The reasoning for why this arises is that I have a use case where a driver
is trying to call rproc_boot() to establish an RPMsg connection.
(1) comes up because a device structure is copied so the comparison will
not work as currently constructed.
(2) comes up in our use case because the rproc structure device in an
internal driver doesn’t yet have a child to iterate up from. (2) is solved
in our use case by starting at the current device.
Thanks,
Ben
Hi All,
I have 2 items for discussion for the community call tomorrow:
For the Remoteproc-core API rproc_get_by_child
I have a use case where I would like to call this on the current
rproc->device.
2 things:
1. At [1]https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/remotep
roc/remoteproc_core.c#L2644 There may be a bug here in that if
the device is copied, then device->type comparison will fail.
Can we change this to “if (!strncmp(dev->type->name,
(&rproc_type)->name, strlen((&rproc_type)->name)) ? That way even if
the device is copied the check will work.
2. For the same API, is it Ok to extend the for loop so it supports
search on the ‘current’ device passed in?
That is
change [2]https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/remotep
roc/remoteproc_core.c#L2643
“for (dev = dev->parent; dev; dev = dev->parent) {“
to
“for (; dev; dev = dev->parent) {“
This way we can account for the current device having the rproc dev.
The reasoning for why this arises is that I have a use case where a
driver is trying to call rproc_boot() to establish an RPMsg connection.
(1) comes up because a device structure is copied so the comparison
will not work as currently constructed.
(2) comes up in our use case because the rproc structure device in an
internal driver doesn’t yet have a child to iterate up from. (2) is
solved in our use case by starting at the current device.
Thanks,
Ben
References
1. https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc…
2. https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc…
Hi all,
During the late stages of testing of the v2022.10 OpenAMP library, I ran
across a failure that looks like there is an unexpected interaction between
the library and the Linux remoteproc implementations. We have decided
to delay the release until we understand the problem better.
Regards,
Ed M