On 6/2/22 8:14 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 12:05:09PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
Hi Rob,
Thanks for reviews. Please find my comments below:
On 6/1/22 11:42 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 04:43:05PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
Xilinx ZynqMP platform has dual-core ARM Cortex R5 Realtime Processing Unit(RPU) subsystem. This patch adds dt-bindings for RPU subsystem (cluster).
Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah tanmay.shah@xilinx.com
Changes in v6: - Add maxItems to sram and memory-region property
Changes in v5:
- Add constraints of the possible values of xlnx,cluster-mode property
- fix description of power-domains property for r5 core
- Remove reg, address-cells and size-cells properties as it is not required
- Fix description of mboxes property
- Add description of each memory-region and remove old .txt binding link reference in the description
Changes in v4: - Add memory-region, mboxes and mbox-names properties in example
Changes in v3: - None
.../bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml | 129 ++++++++++++++++++ include/dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h | 6 + 2 files changed, 135 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..cbff1c201a89 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only or BSD-2-Clause) +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/xlnx,r5f-rproc.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+title: Xilinx R5F processor subsystem
+maintainers:
- Ben Levinsky ben.levinsky@xilinx.com
- Tanmay Shah tanmay.shah@xilinx.com
+description: |
- The Xilinx platforms include a pair of Cortex-R5F processors (RPU) for
- real-time processing based on the Cortex-R5F processor core from ARM.
- The Cortex-R5F processor implements the Arm v7-R architecture and includes a
- floating-point unit that implements the Arm VFPv3 instruction set.
+properties:
- compatible:
- const: xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss
- xlnx,cluster-mode:
- $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
- enum: [0, 1, 2]
- description: |
The RPU MPCore can operate in split mode(Dual-processor performance), Safety
lock-step mode(Both RPU cores execute the same code in lock-step,
clock-for-clock) or Single CPU mode (RPU core 0 can be held in reset while
core 1 runs normally). The processor does not support dynamic configuration.
Switching between modes is only permitted immediately after a processor reset.
If set to 1 then lockstep mode and if 0 then split mode.
If set to 2 then single CPU mode. When not defined, default will be lockstep mode.
+patternProperties:
- "^r5f-[a-f0-9]+$":
- type: object
- description: |
The RPU is located in the Low Power Domain of the Processor Subsystem.
Each processor includes separate L1 instruction and data caches and
tightly coupled memories (TCM). System memory is cacheable, but the TCM
memory space is non-cacheable.
Each RPU contains one 64KB memory and two 32KB memories that
are accessed via the TCM A and B port interfaces, for a total of 128KB
per processor. In lock-step mode, the processor has access to 256KB of
TCM memory.
- properties:
compatible:
const: xlnx,zynqmp-r5f
power-domains:
description: RPU core PM domain specifier
maxItems: 1
mboxes:
minItems: 1
items:
- description: mailbox channel to send data to RPU
- description: mailbox channel to receive data from RPU
mbox-names:
minItems: 1
items:
- const: tx
- const: rx
sram:
$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
maxItems: 8
minItems: 1 maxItems: 8 items: maxItems: 1
I have posted v7 which adds "minItems: 1".
However, I didn't get items: part. Is it required to have items: now?
Yes.
Can I add items: part once TCM bindings are posted?
No.
I understand that minItems and maxItems under sram property decides how many phandles sram can have.
However, maxItems: 1 under items: field what it describes?
'phandle-array' is really a matrix type because we can have phandles plus argument cells. So you have to define each of the 1-8 entries is a single phandle cell (and no arg cells).
Thanks for explanation. I will send new revision as suggested.
Rob